Hi Paul



 RM> I'm having trouble getting Indent (from Indentx.zip dated 10-6-93,



 PE> Grab INDENTPE.ZIP instead, much better.



Will do.



 RM> in your Indent area) to line up subsequent lines in function

 RM> headers. The -di:n parameter doesn't work when n=0. Could you run

 RM> your OS/2 version over the following to see if it turns out

 RM> different? It's already been through this Indent once.



 PE> It turns out different, I'll let you compare the differences...



Ta. Very different. I think the version I have is buggy. For

instance, when tabs are enabled, it uses spaces instead of tabs to

put in the extra space after the  /* INDENT: -di:0 */ line.



Re c++: your version put a space between the :: symbols that show

class possession, prolly a side effect of its recognition of C label

lines. Shall I ask in the C echo about C++ Indents, or should I

attempt to add some extras to yours?



Cheers



--- PPoint 1.88