From: "Willmer B. Wonsang" 
Here is a suggestion.  
If the subject line of the message would begin with "Editor:", we will be 
able to identify the editor messages.  This will allow:
*	The readers who want to read about Editor issues may.
*	The readers who do not want to be spammed with Editor issues could simply 
delete the mail message with bothering to read it.
Just a thought.
----------
From: 	James C. Sewell[SMTP:jims@MPGN.COM]
Sent: 	Thursday, October 09, 1997 8:37 AM
To: 	tsepro@semware.com
Subject: 	Re: Why not use comp.editors ?
At 09:14 AM 10/9/97 Eric Stork, whom God loves, said:
>Many of us are far to busy to waste time on news groups -- the
>sharp focus of this system on TSE-PRO is exactly what's needed.  I hope
>others feel as I do on this matter.
I agree with Eric.  It is unfortunate that the folks who do read
comp.editors will miss out on the most-excellent program we all love, but
it is great to have a "pure" forum to discuss "How do I do this in a macro"
rather than "What makes you think TSE-Pro is so much better than Emacs"
flame wars in comp.editors.
Thanks to SemWare for hosting this discussion list.  If they ever stop we
will have to institute a new one somewhere since the list is mega-helpful.
 Jim
---
---------------