Hello Janis!

Friday May 20 2011 22:52, you wrote to me:

 >>>> date did they appear? I'll check my logs. Maybe one of my
 >>>> downlinks?

 JK> That is what it seems like to me, Marc.. not your system, but a
 JK> downlink?

 >> Thanks, I'll check my logs tonight. Pretty unusual for Squish to
 >> just regurgitate messages when there's been no change in uplinks.

See my message to Bob Seaborn.

 JK> Exactly my thought.. your system hasn't been down at all.. I even
 JK> netmailed you recently ..

 >> I have a node which recently revised his system. I'm wondering if
 >> something ma have happened on his system and my end didn't catch
 >> them.

 JK> That's what I thought..  From here, I thought perhaps they went from
 JK> your downlink to you, out to Ross - since they were quite old, and
 JK> possibly all marked as 'new' on the originating system, no one would
 JK> pick them up as dupes.. they were much too old to be considered dupes.
 JK> JMO..

 JK> Here's the seen-by and path info from one that got posted in Z1C:

 JK> -!-PATH: 138/666 146 392 123/500 261/38

138/146 (me) to 138/392 (downlink) and then out to 123/500 (Ross).

138/392 should only be linked to one of us for any given echo.




Marc

                         lookglas{at}harbornet.com
                      BinkP/FTP: lookglas.tzo.com


--- GoldED/386 3.0.1-os1