Hi James Mckenzie, Yes it's me again 
18-Jan-98 11:50:09, James Mckenzie wrote to Steven Cox
          Subject: X2
 JM> Hello Steven!
 JM> 15 Jan 98 20:11, Steven Cox wrote to James Mckenzie:
 SC>> Hello James!
 SC>> Replying to a message of James Mckenzie to Steven Cox:
 JM>>> Hello Steven!
 JM>>> 06 Jan 98 19:59, Steven Cox wrote to David Durgee:
 SC>>>> This did not work either.  I thought it was going to but I get
 SC>>>> disconected.
 JM>>> Try this if you are using IBM's Dial Other Internet Providers
 JM>>> (DOIP)
 SC>> SLIPPM.EXE is DOIP right?
 JM> Yes, it is.
 JM>>> program. Leave the entry in the Command block empty.  This will
 JM>>> allow the program to "learn" what your provider uses.  In this
 JM>>> area I've used two providers that present the following:
 JM>>> Login: (or login:) and expect your user id. Password: (or
 JM>>> password:) and expect your password.  Once connected, they both
 JM>>> switch to PPP automagically.  Thus the command script for both
 JM>>> of them will look for in: and word: and give the appropriate
 JM>>> response.  Once the information is sent, PPP is started by DOIP.
 SC>> This did not work either.  Thanks for trying though!
 JM> Hmmm.  Keep on plugging then.  I hope that they do not use MS's
 JM> CHAP, as DOIP will not handle it (Plain PAP on the other hand is
 JM> handled, by entering the word NONE in the Login Sequence block. My
 JM> ISP uses PAP and CHAP for logins).
You may wish to take a look at In-Joy. I believe that it can handle that it
can handle MS's propritary CHAP protocol. I have droped ISP's over their
switching to NT. I have a couple of NT boxes here an do not consider it a
reliable NOS for an ISP (not to mention the needless wast of resources when
running NT).
 -=> See Ya!!, William Geiger <=-
--- Terminate 5.00/Pro 
---------------