On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:58:02 GMT, Terry Stone 
wrote:

>Ted,
>   I like the way you love to attack everyone for having an opinion
>which does not fit your thought process - sort of reminds me of the
>Nazis during WWII - my way or death. Your accusations are all that keeps
>you alive at times and I know that you do have information worth sharing
>to say but have yet to learn to control yourself to make the points. You
>always have to make someone look bad or come up with an accusation to
>discredit them so as to keep you on top. Your accusation in this case is
>a "shill" which I for one think is ridiculous. If you can provide I am a
>shill for someone then do so; if not then you owe me and this ng an
>apology for being such an arrogant and obnoxious person when things do
>not go your way. Talking of "shills" is Ronnie Ruff yours?

funny how you just did exactly what you accuse Ted of doing, and then
throw in a jab at another person you don't like who nothing to do with
this.

if you're going to take the 'moral' high ground, don't do what you
accuse those you dislike of doing.

enjoy the ride and thanks for doing what all trolls like their threads
to do, create division.


>   As far as surveys go it is up to the reader to decide to do this or
>not. They should be able to read what is there and decide to submit or
>not. Lets give people on these old computers a little credit for having
>a thinking process.
>   You say I am a relative newcomer to computers and to email.... Since
>I remember using ROSCOE for an email system on the mainframe back in the
>late 60 and early 70s could be mistaken on the actual start date and I
>have used email since forums started I would say our time in this is
>equal or not. So when did you work with computer systems, what degrees
>do you have behind them, and how long have you been using email? 
>   Also, what medical background do you have in diabetes? What research
>or papers have you published in this area or in information sciences?
>Where can we read these?
>
>Ted Rosenberg wrote:
>> 
>> Terry, I have been in computers MUCH longer than you have, I have had
>> email for longer than you have been in computers, so don't try the
>> "authority" fallacious argument.
>> 
>> That fact does not make MY opinion any better, any more than it makes
>> YOUR argument any good
>> 
>> Any idiot who argues that in some way being able to wire a board makes
>> them any more an expert on usenet fraud is clearly showing off their
>> incompetence.
>> 
>> SOME possible relevance is in my years of experience with usenet and its
>> predecessors, moderated groupmail and echoes - but actually, the real
>> days of fraudulent surveys are only the last few years.
>> 
>> You are a relative newcomer here, and you are QUITE welcome to answer
>> ANY scam on the net - What bothers me is that in your recent posts, you
>> seem to have become a shill, for scammers, and appear to be being paid.
>> 
>> Anyone who does not heed warnings not to fill out surveys for
>> unidentified sources will reap the consequences.
>>



Derek
Type 1 since 1975
Minimed 508 Insulin Pump
http://www.diabeticnet.com
http://sweetblood.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org
http://www.diabetesinterview.com
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2001/06/cureall.htm