From: Jim Gashel 
Subject: Re: Conflict of Interest
Harvey:
Since I believe I am the one who first wrote to this list that you are a
chronic complainer, I would now offer my appologies if you somehow feel
offended by the label.  I was just searching for a term for someone who
seems to find something negative about almost everything that our national
leadership does.  I had know intention of offending you by calling you a
chronic complainer, but I honestly couldn't think of another shorthand way
to describe a person who is almost never happy whith what is being done by
those we have chosen to do it.  If you can think of a better label to
describe people who dwell in the negative, I would be happy to consider
applying it to you.  Another alternative for you would be to approach life
with a little balance.  Try building some, rather than just tearing down.  
thanks,
J. G.
On Wed, 27 Aug 1997 hheagy@delphi.com wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1997-08-27 NFB-Talk@NFBnet.org said:
>  NF>Harvy: Look here Harvy unless you can stop calling people really
>  NF>nasty names then I think you need to find another group to inflict
>  NF>your bile upon.  I for one am sick of all this.
> Excuse me, but I was called a chronic complainer and I don't have
> to take that kind of garbage from anyone!  As Mr. Gashel well
> knows, I was at every session of the Spring Vendor's Conference in
> Las Vegas.  I also wrote an article about it for the Merchant
> Messenger which I also submitted to the Monitor.  I tried very hard
> to be as accurate as possible with everything including spelling
> and addresses which involved a lot of work.  I also worked the
> Vendor's Division table at the convention.
> 
> Your husband also knows that I prepared a comprehensive repeater
> directory for all the hams attending the convention who wanted it. 
> This involved about 6 months of work to get it as accurate as
> possible, sending prototypes to several people to get their
> opinions on it and over a 1,000 sheet box of fan fold computer
> braille paper for which I charged the Ham Radio Group nothing.  I
> have done a lot of work for this organization; So don't you dare
> call me down when you don't know your facts!
> 
> I could give you lots of examples of behavior by our own leaders
> that would make that of the Nacsters look ethical, but if the
> national wishes to bury its head in the sand and not deal with
> things that need to be dealt with by calling those of us who are
> trying to point out things to them that we are chronic complainers
> or saying that if Jim Omvig said it we might deal with it and other
> such cop-outs I guess that's its business, but we will one day pay
> a heavy price for this kind of nonsense.  
> 
> Every time we try to point out even the slightest disagreement with
> the national leadership on anything we are greeted with sarcasm,
> name calling and psychological abuse at their hands.  Why can't it
> gracefully accept criticism like they expect u s to do?  It seems
> that they can dish it out, but they can't take it.  Apparently, in
> your mind, it's all right when the national leadership does it.  
> 
> Mr. Gashel well knows the problems with the vending program here
> and our state leadership's unwillingness to pursue a La. Randolph-
> shepherd Act or a separate agency for the blind.
> 
> I spoke with Charles Allen about taking on the issue of
> discrimination against totally blind verses partially sighted
> operators in the Randolph-shepherd Program which he agreed we had
> to take on.  I had a resolution to that effect at the above
> referred to conference which was remanded to the Vendor's division
> board.  I would have presented more but there wasn't time.  I
> didn't kick and scream and complain about that; I accepted the
> decision of those present.  That is more work I did for this
> organization.    
> 
> I am sorry as I can be for the tone of that last post, but I
> didn't start it.  Disagreeing with me is one th ing, what is
> being done is quite another.
> 
> 
---
---------------