On (07 Jan 98) Bob Wright wrote to Leslie Satenstein...
Hi Bob,
 LS> Can someone tell me what injoy can do that DIOP cannot? To date I have
 LS> never had a communication problem using DOIP so why bother with a third
 LS> product. The same holds true for comm.sys and vcom.sys (I have not
 LS> noticed any difference in my 30 day evaluation of sio)
 LS> So I await some users who can convince me to change
 BW> I'm with you on the InJoy... I *NEVER* got the fool thing to work
 BW> here... even after following various people's advice... With 5 account
 BW> ID's being used here, I've found the DOIP to be more useful because of
 BW> the ease of setup...
Some things will never work on the unregistered or base registered
version, such as dial-on-demand and ip masquerading.  At the
intermediate level, these work fine.
Some people have mentioned the need to deal with resolv files in the
tcpip\etc directory.  The redial and multiple phone numbers of inJoy
worked for me the first time I tried them.  I registered at the
intermediate level, and use the dial-on-demand.  It works quite well.
If you want some of the features of inJoy, but that uses the same system
files as DOIP, check out iLink/2.  It gives you the multiple phone
number and redial capablilities, but doesn't have the DOD or IP
functions inJoy has.
TTYL,
Stephen
Team OS/2, Team GEOS
OS/2 & Geoworks Ensemble - What a combo!
... OS/2 Born To Multitask.
--- PPoint 2.05
---------------