From: Al and Masha Sten-Clanton 
Subject: Re: Resolution 97.04
On Tue, 14 Oct 1997 hheagy@delphi.com wrote:
> Another possibility is that these high rise complexes for the
> elderly and handicapped need outlets for residents to purchase
> food and other incidentals and many of the privately financed
> ones do not have such an outlet.  I would be a bit leery about
> going into the public housing sights, but the high rise buildings
> may be another possibility for randolph-shepherd locations, but
> the key words here are always, "rent free and utilities free."
> Why should contractors give us rent and utility free locations
> when they can get rent and utilities paid by another tenant?
> This may be something we will have to look at.
> 
> Harvey
Makes sense to me!
Al
---
---------------