>
 >>> I had e-mail contact with the author, Harald Harms. The key
 >>> generator is not the real problem. The real problem is that the
 >>> source code is lost. If the source were available it would be easy
 >>> to make a version that does not need a key. Or conversely, retrieve
 >>> the algorithm for the key(s).
 >
 >BS>       Mikey lies, the source code is NOT lost, I have it all!
 >
 > Not lies, wrong information at most. It is what Harald told me...


      When one does not know the truth, and spouts wrong information as fact,
it is indeed a lie.  Therefore you lie!  Basic logic.



 >
 > If that information is incorrect, why did you not say so straight away
 > when I asked you if you had the source?


      Probably because you had no need to know.


 >
 > And for the record, my name is Michiel, not Mikey.


      So you say, however based on your activity here, you are still mikey.

--- GEcho/32 & IM 2.50