Greetings, Leslie...
 Leslie Satenstein hastily said to Charles Bowman:
 LS> Can someone tell me what injoy can do that DIOP cannot? To date I have
 LS> never had a communication problem using DOIP so why bother with a third
 LS> product. The same holds true for comm.sys and vcom.sys (I have not
 LS> noticed any difference in my 30 day evaluation of sio)
 LS> So I await some users who can convince me to change
I'm with you on the InJoy... I *NEVER* got the fool thing to work here... 
even after following various people's advice... With 5 account ID's being 
used here, I've found the DOIP to be more useful because of the ease of 
setup...
I'm also giving the new Advantis dialler a try (since I am in ibm.net).  It 
also allows multiple profiles, as well as enabling use of either SLIP or 
PPP...
As for SIO, it allows me to lock my com ports at 115200, rather than the 
57600 that COM.SYS maxes out on.  I got roundly slagged for commenting on 
that here a while back, but now that I have a second machine, it's been quite 
nice transfer stuff back and forth via a null-modem cable (on COM2) between 
the two machines at the higher speed.  (And yes, it is noticeably faster..).  
There are other advantages to SIO as well, but since I don't tend to play 
with communications stuff, I haven't really exercised them...
        -- Bob
--- GoldED 2.41
---------------