Hello Robert,

On Tuesday July 14 2020 19:02, you wrote to me:

 RW> editor was never more than "soso" and Interecho -> never got further
 RW> than crippleware. I tried it for a short time and -> then threw it
 RW> out. There were beter tossers around back then. -> -> The present
 RW> maintainer? Well, is there a 32 bit version yet? I don't -> think
 RW> so... ->

 RW> Dale Barnes is the current maintain

I know that is how he presents himself...

 RW> and yes, there is a 3.0 Windows version that he has not released yet.
 RW> A couple of us are trying to get him to, but so far to no availl.

Which is exactly where we were when Peter Stewart left for greener pastures two
decades ago. Peter claimed he was working on a Windows version and we were
shown some screenshots to wet our appetites. But it was never released.
Vapourware was how we called it. I see that the situation has not changed in
20+ years...

 RW> And yes, he is a Fido node, too.

And an NC, but so far he has been unresponsive regarding an erroneous ,IBM flag
in his segment...

 RW> -> RW> So what, are you trying to tell me and the rest of the known
 RW> worl -> RW> that Wildcat is a non-standard BBS package? -> -> I am
 RW> trying to tell you that it is decades old abandonware that has -> not
 RW> evolved into the third decade of the 21st century along with the ->
 RW> rest of Fidonet.

See the fucked up quoting above?

 RW> Then if it's bothersome, contact Santronics since they own it and
 RW> WINserver has the same quoting scheme.  I am sure they would be happy
 RW> to change it for their BBS customers and ignore the commercial
 RW> customers they have.

Not my responsibility. As a sysop, YOU are responsible for the crap you inject
into the network. If you use broken software it is YOUR responsibility to get
it fixed or stop using it.

BTW, I have not forgotten about that mailbomb...


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303