On 02-21-95 STEPHEN LINDHOLM wrote to ART KIM... 
 
 SL> The IDE isn't as good as it good be. It also has agonizingly slow 
 SL> those of us (such as me) who are used to the speed of Microsoft QuickC 
 SL> Pentium in DOS. Ie, compiles <1 second long. Its quite a change going 
 
I know that Borland's DOS version was about double in speed compared 
to QC even before a good pre-compiled header were added with 3.1.  I 
doubt QC can compile in near 1 second range if header files were 
100k or larger. 
 
 SL> something where you actually have to WAIT. (I really wish someone 
 SL> realize that not everyone needs optimization all of the time and come 
 SL> a compiler that compiles as fast as QuickC did for 32 bit OS/2.) 
 
IMO, I think all compiler should have options to disable optimization. 
 
BTW, I am curious if your compiler support "rt" for fopen(). 
 
Aloha,  Keiichi  :-)  
 
--- 
 * OFFLINE 1.56 * <:-)  cone head smile 

--- GOMail v2.0t Beta [94-0471]