Hi, Paul.

PE> Hi Frank, can you do the following trades...

PE>                QUANTITY       SELL-PRICE
PE> 1996-07-16 NTS 54000 0.09378  11.5       (1)
PE> 1996-12-18 NTS 51000 0.095    12.5       (2)
PE> 1997-01-09 NTS 53000 0.095    12         (3)
PE> 1997-04-02 NTS 23000 0.11     13         (4)
PE> 1997-04-16 NTS 28658 0.095    13         (5)

OK they're on, but I need to know if they're in *addition* to, or
*replace* some or all of what you had on already. Before this you had
(selling):

 51,658 {at} 13    (A)
101,000 {at} 13.5  (B)
  4,000 {at} 13.5  (C)
 30,000 {at} 15    (D)

It looks to me like (1) & (2) replace (B) & (C); (3) is new; (4) & (5)
replace (A) and (D) remains.

I've actually put them all in as new orders at the moment because it
didn't look like any would be hit yesterday - and they weren't. If they
were likely to I would have called you of course. Let me know if I
guessed right in the previous paragraph, or otherwise.

For the record, you also have buying orders for:

13,342 {at} 9.5
53,000 {at} 9.5

PE> Also, sell all my ZEX at 2.1.

Selling 275,000 ZEX at 2.1

PE> If you don't understand the above format, give me a call.  That's the outpu
PE> of my program, so it's convenient for me to keep track of it.

Understood the format, although some of those parcels didn't correspond
to any you'd actually bought - some did, but some were combinations and
some were part of parcels.

Does this new program of yours (semi)automatically decide what you want
to sell? Teach it to send an internet message and cut yourself out of
the loop! When SEATS97 comes in, maybe we can cut both of us out of the
loop!

Regards, fIM.
---
 þ * þ Sexism is a social disease.
@EOT:

---