ZZ>
  > FWIW, 1.5 includes a BC_WF.DLL in the BIN directory that
  > appears to provide Workframe integration.
ZZ>

  I was about to say "what about the linker and debugger?", when I
  spotted TLINK_WF.DLL as well.

  Very interesting.  There's even a profile, BORLAND.PRF.

  Well spotted.

ZZ>
  >                                            I'm not aware
  > that Borland admits to its existance, though... 
ZZ>

  That would be encouraging people not to use Borland's own IDE though,
  wouldn't it ?  (-:

  It looks like Borland gets a checkmark in that box as well, along with a
  note that WorkFrame support isn't documented anywhere obvious in the
  manuals or on-line help, which is why I missed it (as has everyone
  else in the whole year and a bit that the Pros and Cons list has been
  running).

  Which leaves EMX C++ as the odd one out, with an author who is on
  record as saying that he doesn't intend to WorkFrame-enable his
  product ...

  Not everyone likes command lines, especially non-standard cryptic
  UNIXy ones.  The people involved in EMX C++ don't seem to be able to
  grasp this, though.

  > JdeBP <
___
 X MegaMail 2.10 #0:
--- Maximus/2 2.02