From: Adam 

Gary Britt wrote:
> Breyer can have an opinion but the court didn't have constitutional
> authority to issue ANY opinion on this because congress took away federal
> court jurisdiction on this case in 2005.  5 of the Supremes decided to
> ignore that and pretend they did have jurisdiction to issue an opinion.
> However, the fact remains the decision, imho and the opinion of 4 justices
> on the Supremes, is that by continuing jurisdiction and expressing any
> opinion the court is acting in violation of the constitution.
>

ROFLMAO.....ah Gary you are a hoot.

Exactly who is placed within the constitution to decide the
constitutionality of their expression of an opinion?

The Supreme Court?

Ah the wonders of a paper monarch & it's courtiers.

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5