| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Coaling Stations, was:The Grey Lady |
From: Adam Flinton Frank Haber wrote: > Curiosity question: > > Thinking back to accounts of chasing down the Bismarck, etc., I remember being > struck by the fact that the ?Hood, was it, had to stop chasing because it was > running out of fuel. I also seem to remember that it had only been steaming > 1000 mi. or so. So, > It wasn't the Hood she was a battlecruiser & they had good range as part of their design......but the rest of the ships had got low on fuel which is partly why the swordfish attack was a "last roll of the dice". > o Was fuel consumption so high at flank speed that a battleship couldn't carry > enough fuel for more than that? > Yes & no. It depended on the battleship. The US & Japan had long range battleships because of the scale of the Pacific. The UK had shorter range battleships partly because the Atlentic was more important to us & partly coz we had lots of re-fuelling points round the globe. This mattered quite a lot near the end of the war where there were combined UK/US task groups formating on Japan & the US fleet had much better endurance than the UK one. > o One would assume that they'd have to build for a 4-5000 mile range at > cruise, at least? Did flank burn 4-5x the fuel? > Take the GGV'es which had in many ways the worst range of the UK main battleships. http://www.ptbo.igs.net/~howe112/King%20George%20Class.htm "Range in Kilometres (unless otherwise specified) Howe: 6,000 nautical mmiles at 14 knots with clean bottom." > o And when did capital ships go from coal to oil in the US and Brit navies? > WW1. The UK Queen Elizabeth class of "superdreadnoughts" (inc warspite etc) were oil burners. > o For coal-fired ships, was it all slurry-coal and automatic stokers after the > WWI era? > Lots of the old uns were cut up because of the washington naval treaty & most pre 1914 ships were scrapped as they cost more than (post war) they were worth. > o How did a collier (ship) work in the Dreadnought era? Was there mid-ocean > refueling? > I don't think so. Maybe but it would have been very difficult. e.g. the 1st battle of the falklands occurred while the British Battle cruisers were in Port Stanley refuelling & as such the German ships didn't see much smoke or indeed masts till it was too late to run. > -from NYC, where they're just getting rid of the last *manually-fired* > anthracite furnaces in our public schools, fercryingoutlout, in 2003. > There's nowt wrong wi'coal Adam --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/1.45) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.