| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Time: a priori or not |
gpaschos{at}netscape.net (George Paschos) wrote in
news:bm1bc4$iul$1{at}darwin.ediacara.org:
> I don't understand the conspiracy here but I accept its humorous
> underside: don't know the names and what each represents and how you
> know that Wirt has replied and more.....
>
>> Wirt has already followed on the technicals. I just want to nominate
>> the title of the thread for the annual Hofstadter award for best
>> self- referential thread title of the year :-)
Wirt is Wirt Atmar, a frequent and very knowledgeable contributor to this
newsgroup. Your newsreader or ISP may have missed the follow-up he posted
to your original thread - this happens frequently. Unfortunately I deleted
his reply, so I can't reprint it here. My recollection is that it included
several web sites for further information on your question, so you should
see if you can track it down via Google.
Douglas Hofstadter is the author of "Godel, Escher, Bach - the Eternal
Golden Braid", which is partly about Godel's incompleteness theorem, and
includes much discussion of self-referential statements and other
paradoxes. If you have never read it I strongly recommend it. While I
realize it was unintended on your part, it struck me as paradoxical that
time might not be "a priori".
Yours,
Bill Morse
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com
---
* RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
* RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 10/9/03 6:15:06 AM
* Origin: MoonDog BBS, Brooklyn,NY, 718 692-2498, 1:278/230 (1:278/230)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 278/230 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.