++> Keith Knapp wrote to David Martorana
 ++> on "PERFECTION"
 
 KK> Mark made the point well that you have to have an idea of a
 KK> 'perfect' orbit clearly in mind in order to get something
 KK> into orbit.  But I guess I would make the point that the
 KK> perfect orbit is a human invention, not something inherent
 KK> in external reality.
 
 KK> Does that make any sense?
 
     Yes! .......as much as sense might. As you suggest, Nature seems
     not in need of "perfection" (nor non-perfection) in carrying out
     the everyday chores of maintaining a universe ..........But then
     Nature does not bear the *enormous*  importance of burden placed
     on our species' to create or reflect FUTURE .............? 
 
     Does that make any sense?
 
                                (((- - - - @@ ... ol' jaded Dave ...
 
 
--- Maximus/2 3.01
---------------