| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Fidonet Technical Guidelines |
MT>> FTS-1 is not needed anymore. PW> It is needed, as the lowest common denominator. Dale suggested PW> moving to EMSI - this would instantly put systems which don't support EMSI PW> in violation of standards. Are either of you planning to rewrite PW> those products to comply? Since we would not get te sources this is out of questions, but are there a considerable ammount of fido-system who does not have EMSI capabilities? What do you say about that ip-nodes which only speak the binkd protocol? PW> How about connections which aren't good enough to support EMSI PW> handshaking? I doubt that they are good enough for fts-1. And does anybody use modems without a recovery protocol, so no errors creep in the comunications. Also the telephone lines are quite good nowadays. PW> Making EMSI the preferred protocol I wouldn't mind, but removing PW> FTS-1 is a big mistake. This would be a compromiss i could defend. ---* Origin: TSP - highly portable toss (2:2433/1245) SEEN-BY: 201/0 100 200 209 300 400 407 411 505 600 203/600 204/450 700 205/0 SEEN-BY: 206/0 270/101 490/21 633/267 270 @PATH: 2433/1245 1200 225 270/101 201/505 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.