Salutatio Keith!
13-Mar-98, Keith Knapp wrote to Richard Meic
          Subject: Time and Again        2/2
 KK>> If space and time are properties of matter as we know it, then
 KK>> when matter as we know it didn't yet exist, there was no 'inside
 KK>> of.'
 KK> RM>Ahh huh!  The BB cop-out, dead-end, argument.  Theoretically,
 KK> no sense RM>can be made at singularity, so how can THAT
 KK> mega-assumption be taken RM>seriously.  It sounds like creationist
 KK> non-sense to me.
 KK> Touche.  
With that I have just squashed the BB theory at the start.  All those
observations, hypothesizing, theorizing etc dies at an ASSUMED
singularity, that cannot be supported in any verifiable way, that cannot
be understood using the four (or even the false fifth proposed by
Einstein) forces of nature.
BUUUUT, if we ignore THAT, then it all makes sense, right?

Cosmology has become the holy grail of religious fundamentalists, the BB
theory (or what I like to call the BB hypothesis) is as religious as the
"God" hypothesis,... and just as valid scientifically.
Many supporters of science hold that this kind of thing does not happen,
because of the scientific method's checks and balances.  There seems to
be too much "faith" in the human species to follow the scientific
method.
 KK> See how cleverly I managed to make this on-topic?  
Ditto.  
 Dicere...
 email address (vrmeic@nucleus.com)
Richard Meic
--- Terminate 5.00/Pro 
---------------