RP> On 02-16-98, JOHN SAMPSON declared to ROBERT PLETT:
[snip]
JS> Furthermore, such a scandal could be disasterous for Gore in
JS> 2000 since he's involved with this administration.
JS> So the mantra of "preserve the party and Gore at all costs"
JS> will be taken up by them.
RP> Gore is far less important for them to preserve than the party
RP> and liberalism itself is.  If that house of cards that is the
RP> administration comes apart, they'll sacrifice a tainted Gore in
RP> a heartbeat to save the party and their ideals.
Speaking of Gore...I was just reading something concerning Ross
Peerot making noises about backing Gore in 2000--that is, until the
Monica thing came out. At first I thought it was almost too weird,
even for him, and must be a joke, but when I got to thinking about
who Gore would probably be running against--George Bush Jr...and then
it started to make sense. That wacko hates the Bush's so much I can
see him backing Gore just for spite. It that nut didn't have all that
money I think someone would have had him committed already. He's way
beyond "excentric" in my book.
RP> Gore is far less important for them to preserve than the party
RP> and liberalism itself is.  If that house of cards that is the
RP> administration comes apart, they'll sacrifice a tainted Gore in
RP> a heartbeat to save the party and their ideals.
Yep, and isn't that just "precious"? They wouldn't recognize loyalty
if it bit them on the behinds.
... Ross Perot is temperamental:  50% temper, 50% mental.
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
* LAKOTA v1.5
--- Alexi/Mail 2.02b (#10000)
---------------