| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | double-sending |
In a message to Anthony about "double-sending", Rod said: AM> I tried out the V32b/MNP4 tonight as Paul requested a while back due AM> to the new Thunder supposedly being faster at MNP4, and the thruput AM> was pathetic. About 103%, as opposed to 114% with V32b/V42/V42b. RS> Rather strange. Corse it really needs more testing, its even possible RS> you have for example seen double sending very late in that file and RS> thats why the result wasnt very good. Could be, as I wasn't watching all that carefully. I'd changed the modem config the day before, and only realized it when the % efficiency stat came up at the end of the poll. Normally it's 1650cps (114%) give or take a bit. What rates do you get when everything is going al right? Which correction/compression protocol do you normally use? AM> Interesting thing is, I've hardly ever had a connection/negotiation AM> problem this way... RS> Thats said to vaguely. Its not clear if you are saying you get RS> connection/negotiation problems one way and not another or just what. Come to think of it, I've never had a connection problem of any kind, whether I use V32b/MNP4 or V32b/V42/V42b (normal setting). The odd thing is though that Brenton at least used to get the occasional failed negotiation, at least in the early days with the Sportster - haven't thought to ask recently though. 'tnt, Amfony. --- Maximus/2 2.01wb* Origin: Insanity Prevails (3:711/934.5) SEEN-BY: 640/305 711/934 @PATH: 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.