| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | (1/3) Packet type 2, draft 990328 |
Hi Andreas, PW>>> Because then it wouldn't be a type-2 packet JH>> True. Why do we have to stick to old standards anyway? AK> Because you would break all existing software otherwise. This standard AK> documents the _current_ implementation. That's true so far, but if you want (or have to) change something anyways, you will have to set a new standard. And the new one need not be a type-2 packet. Ciao, Christian --- Kruemel Boks!* Origin: Ch-Ch-Chat around the world! (2:240/2188) SEEN-BY: 201/0 100 200 209 300 400 407 411 505 600 203/600 204/450 700 205/0 SEEN-BY: 206/0 270/101 490/21 633/267 270 @PATH: 240/2188 5202 5010 2433/225 270/101 201/505 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.