Brent Shellenberg wrote in a message to Anthony Tibbs:

 BS> fts-1). Try writing a mailer totally "to the word" of fts-1
 BS> and you'll have a mailer that will only work with
 BS> BinkleyTerm. :) At the very least, fts-1 should be
 BS> re-written to reflect true practice, since a strict fts-1
 BS> implementation is basically useless.

I know this very well.  Heck, I've got a  mailer here
I've been slapping together every now and then, and although it doesn't
VIOLATE FTS-1, it is pretty close to it.  (Trying to make up for the
idiocies of OTHER mailers, etc.)

Take care,
Anthony
tibbsa{at}usa.net

--- WaterGate v0.94.PRE23 Unreg