DA>The Glocks, in all calibers, are finicky guns to load for.  They have
DA>stiff recoil springs and a recoil geometry such that you can't shoot
DA>light target loads. They have throating that causes excessing leading
The ultra velocity round in the USP don't eject until I get to about 
80-90K power factor.  John Schulte and I had a good laugh over this new 
'assault' type of action.  Looked like something you'd see in a bad 
movie.  :-)
DA>It would be very risky, in my opinion, to go outside of standard
DA>reloading parameters as published in recognized reloading manuals when
DA>reloading for a Glock of any caliber.
Good point on the Glocks, they do bear very cautious use.  Then again, I 
examine the USP after every round as well.
DA>Even if you were using the exact same model of handgun as Sandow,
DA>you need to understand a lot about internal ballistics before going
DA>outside of established parameters, even when someone else did it first.
DA>I know Sandow, and he would not intentionally screw with anyone.  But
DA>don't EVER trust anyone on the net if they give you something outside of
Agreed wholeheartedly, one must approach this as if they were doing it 
for themselves for the very first time ever.
DA>(Hint, one of John's previous handguns *DID* !! )  Do you know exactly
You rememnber the .380?  Or was this the 1006?  :-)
DA>with loads on the high end, you have to prepare for ruining your
DA>firearm. If one isn't prepared for paying those prices, then one
DA>shouldn't push the envelope.
Bingo.  FAR 91.3 paraphrased:  The shooter is the _final authority_ as to
all operations of the shooting of the gun.
I've put hundreds of hours into working with these loads. (Many of which
BTW are _within_ parameters, just even safer than normal.)
þ SLMR 2.0 þ NWO Gun Control: for fear of revolution, NOT crime.
* LAKOTA v1.5
--- Alexi/Mail 2.02 (#10000)
---------------