From: Robert Comer 

>So not the Vikings then?

No, they didn't stay.

>How about the English fishermen etc who were habitually fishing the
>grand banks much earlier & were landing for water, supplies etc?

Don't think so, did they have any intention of permanent camps here in NA?

And does it really matter?

When the Europeans started coming to the "New World" is what I'm
talking about, no more, no less.

>So you're willing to punish entirely innocent US citizens i.e. the kids
>with orphanage or exile ?

Yes. (Or stay with legal relatives, or get adopted by U.S. citizens.) Rule
of law is rule of law.

--
Bob Comer



On Wed, 23 May 2007 12:22:12 +0100, Ad
 wrote:

>Robert Comer wrote:
>>> Why of course? & Which Europeans? The Spanish? The French?
>>
>> Any -- 1492 as I said to Geo.
>>
>
>So not the Vikings then?
>
>How about the English fishermen etc who were habitually fishing the
>grand banks much earlier & were landing for water, supplies etc?
>
>Columbus had to straight across the atlantic coz England controlled the
>UK-Iceland-Greenland-Canada easy route.
>
>>> So you want to either make effective orphans which will need to be
>>> totally supported by the state for the 1st 18 years of life or you wish
>>> to expel US citizens from the US?
>>
>> Yep, not worded that way legally, but yes, that's the jist of it.
>> their parents broke the law and the fault is theirs and theirs alone.
>>
>
>So you're willing to punish entirely innocent US citizens i.e. the kids
>with orphanage or exile ?
>
>Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5