From: Robert Comer 

>Thanks Geo, but I would like to know what Bob means when he says that
>Special Relativity (SR) is just a theory. A *lot* of evidence shows that
>SR is extremely accurate.

You jut wont let it go, will you.

Okay, look up cellular respiration, that I consider a fact, the topic is
VERY well known, lots of experimental evidence, no counter examples.

>We know that SR is not a "this explains everything, and is always true
>forever and ever" theory. But if SR is "just a theory",
what is better?

Fact is better, and fact is 100%, explains everything, no counter evidence.

--
Bob Comer


On Thu, 17 May 2007 19:27:14 +1000, John Beckett
 wrote:

>"Geo."  wrote in message
news::
>> black holes are more than a theory, there is at least what appears to be
>> some evidence. dark matter is more than a theory, there is at least what
>> appears to be some evidence.
>>
>> the theory of indeterminibility is just a theory, there is no evidence.
>
>Thanks Geo, but I would like to know what Bob means when he says that
>Special Relativity (SR) is just a theory. A *lot* of evidence shows that
>SR is extremely accurate.
>
>If SR is just a theory, then only "the Sun will rise tomorrow" type
>statements can be better.
>
>We know that SR is not a "this explains everything, and is always true
>forever and ever" theory. But if SR is "just a theory",
what is better?
>
>John

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5