From: "Mark" 

Well, I understand your sentiment exactly. I'll vote for the commies too,
if the Reps move to surrender to Al Qaeda in Iraq (I'm just clinging to
false hope that they're not as bad as I know they are), as you're right,
it's better to turn the heat full on so even the most deluded RINO voters
can see what they're going to get really quickly 

"Gary Britt"  wrote in
message news:464ce0c9{at}w3.nls.net...
> Its not that I'll be for whatever lying scum ass commie loving democrat I
> vote for, its that the bigger and faster the wave of punk ass commie
> democrats that take over in fell swoop the easier it will be for the
> country to figure out why democrats suck the big one, and the faster will
> be the destruction of the GOP so a new party can rise from the ashes to
> take over.
>
> The problem with creeping socialism of democrats is that it has time to
> lull the sheep to sleep.  What's needed for the proper effect is a full on
> full bore sudden tsunami of democratic socialist control of the American
> government.  No creep, no sleep, just all Pelosi and Obama clones all the
> time 24x7.
>
> Then people like us can support those who come in to pick up the rotting
> carcass of the GOP machine.  Third parties don't work because you can't
> get ballot access.  So let's starve the GOP to death or near death and
> then take over its 50 state ballot access.  In essence we can create a new
> third party, it will just be named the GOP and have control of the 50
> state GOP ballot access.
>
> If this doesn't work then a non-violent civil war or a non-violent war of
> succession of the states so inclined to succeed from the Union might be
> the only way to clean house in Washington and restore some sanity to at
> least some parts of what is left of the former USA.
>
> I'm not kidding.
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> Mark wrote:
>> I agree. Except, I can't bring myself to go so far as to actually cast a
>> lever for Hillary but will sit home instead. But you're exactly right,
>> the GOP has to be completely destroyed so we can get some competent
>> people in there with a new party > survives Dem rule in the meantime -- I have serious doubts we will, at
>> least not in relative calm and freedom from spectacular attacks here on
>> our own land --  but then, the Reps are about this || far from cutting
>> and running in Iraq too, so they're equal opportunity attempted
>> destroyers of this experiment>
>>
>> "Gary Britt" 
wrote in message
>> news:464cd986$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> I called McConnell's office today and told them if they didn't stop this
>>> bill I would never vote republican again for the rest of my life, and I
>>> definitely mean it.  If they don't stop that bill I will join the
>>> moonbat scum I hate calling for impeachment of Bush (just for different
>>> reasons). I'll also encourage everyone I know to vote straight democrat
>>> until the GOP is crushed and the country is tired of Democrat rule that
>>> a new party can rise out of the ashes of the GOP.
>>>
>>> I'm not kidding.  I've had it.  I won't carry water for these
>>> incompetent fools any longer.  I'd rather vote for scum I hate that I
>>> know wants to screw me (because they tell everyone they want to screw
>>> them you just have to pay attention) than continue to support lying scum
>>> incompetents who pretend to be for what I'm for and then screw me.
>>>
>>> I won't give the GOP another warning.  If I turn out to be
>>> representative of a large number of the base in the GOP, then the GOP is
>>> about to fuck itself bigger and better than the craziest moonbat ever
>>> dreamed possible.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> Mark wrote:
>>>> Yup, you got that right Gary. Now that the Reps have rolled over on
>>>> amnesty, they may as well vote to surrender in Iraq as well -- then
>>>> Bush and Cheney can resign simultaneiously and we'll see
what Pelosi is
>>>> really made of. That'll do more for traffic over the Canadian border
>>>> than the Vietnam war did 
>>>>
>>>> "Gary Britt"
 wrote in message
>>>> news:464c6b77$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>>> Nothing would do the republican party good like a
President Pelosi.
>>>>>
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>> Ad wrote:
>>>>>> Gary Britt wrote:
>>>>>>> Quite the opposite.  He didn't want them
disqualified because they
>>>>>>> were republican, but don't let common sense
and facts get in the way
>>>>>>> of the investigations.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Impeach Bush now is what the democrats should
do.  They should put
>>>>>>> all their efforts into it.  At this point in
time, I'd rather have
>>>>>>> President Cheney than President Bush.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> His father screwed the republican party
something fierce and his son
>>>>>>> appears set to out do the old man in this
regard.  A worry I
>>>>>>> expressed many times about Bush before 9/11. 
A worry I suppressed
>>>>>>> after 9/11.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Impeach em both
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then who'd it be? Pelosi?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Adam
>>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5