From: Rich Gauszka 

I'd rather have a mixture of control. I don't trust the critters on either
side of the political spectrum to give them full control.

Both parties seem to have a keen desire to give proof to Lord Acton's axiom
"power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely"


Gary Britt wrote:
> Its not that I'll be for whatever lying scum ass commie loving democrat
> I vote for, its that the bigger and faster the wave of punk ass commie
> democrats that take over in fell swoop the easier it will be for the
> country to figure out why democrats suck the big one, and the faster
> will be the destruction of the GOP so a new party can rise from the
> ashes to take over.
>
> The problem with creeping socialism of democrats is that it has time to
> lull the sheep to sleep.  What's needed for the proper effect is a full
> on full bore sudden tsunami of democratic socialist control of the
> American government.  No creep, no sleep, just all Pelosi and Obama
> clones all the time 24x7.
>
> Then people like us can support those who come in to pick up the rotting
> carcass of the GOP machine.  Third parties don't work because you can't
> get ballot access.  So let's starve the GOP to death or near death and
> then take over its 50 state ballot access.  In essence we can create a
> new third party, it will just be named the GOP and have control of the
> 50 state GOP ballot access.
>
> If this doesn't work then a non-violent civil war or a non-violent war
> of succession of the states so inclined to succeed from the Union might
> be the only way to clean house in Washington and restore some sanity to
> at least some parts of what is left of the former USA.
>
> I'm not kidding.
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> Mark wrote:
>> I agree. Except, I can't bring myself to go so far as to actually cast
>> a lever for Hillary but will sit home instead. But you're exactly
>> right, the GOP has to be completely destroyed so we can get some
>> competent people in there with a new party > whether the US survives Dem rule in the meantime -- I have serious
>> doubts we will, at least not in relative calm and freedom from
>> spectacular attacks here on our own land --  but then, the Reps are
>> about this || far from cutting and running in Iraq too, so they're
>> equal opportunity attempted destroyers of this experiment>
>>
>> "Gary Britt" 
wrote in message
>> news:464cd986$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> I called McConnell's office today and told them if they didn't stop
>>> this bill I would never vote republican again for the rest of my
>>> life, and I definitely mean it.  If they don't stop that bill I will
>>> join the moonbat scum I hate calling for impeachment of Bush (just
>>> for different reasons). I'll also encourage everyone I know to vote
>>> straight democrat until the GOP is crushed and the country is tired
>>> of Democrat rule that a new party can rise out of the ashes of the GOP.
>>>
>>> I'm not kidding.  I've had it.  I won't carry water for these
>>> incompetent fools any longer.  I'd rather vote for scum I hate that I
>>> know wants to screw me (because they tell everyone they want to screw
>>> them you just have to pay attention) than continue to support lying
>>> scum incompetents who pretend to be for what I'm for and then screw me.
>>>
>>> I won't give the GOP another warning.  If I turn out to be
>>> representative of a large number of the base in the GOP, then the GOP
>>> is about to fuck itself bigger and better than the craziest moonbat
>>> ever dreamed possible.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> Mark wrote:
>>>> Yup, you got that right Gary. Now that the Reps have rolled over on
>>>> amnesty, they may as well vote to surrender in Iraq as well -- then
>>>> Bush and Cheney can resign simultaneiously and we'll see what Pelosi
>>>> is really made of. That'll do more for traffic over the Canadian
>>>> border than the Vietnam war did 
>>>>
>>>> "Gary Britt"
 wrote in message
>>>> news:464c6b77$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>>> Nothing would do the republican party good like a
President Pelosi.
>>>>>
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>> Ad wrote:
>>>>>> Gary Britt wrote:
>>>>>>> Quite the opposite.  He didn't want them
disqualified because
>>>>>>> they were republican, but don't let common
sense and facts get in
>>>>>>> the way of the investigations.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Impeach Bush now is what the democrats should
do.  They should
>>>>>>> put all their efforts into it.  At this point
in time, I'd rather
>>>>>>> have President Cheney than President Bush.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> His father screwed the republican party
something fierce and his
>>>>>>> son appears set to out do the old man in this
regard.  A worry I
>>>>>>> expressed many times about Bush before 9/11.  A worry I
>>>>>>> suppressed after 9/11.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Impeach em both
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then who'd it be? Pelosi?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Adam
>>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5