From: Gary Britt 

Its not that I'll be for whatever lying scum ass commie loving democrat I
vote for, its that the bigger and faster the wave of punk ass commie
democrats that take over in fell swoop the easier it will be for the
country to figure out why democrats suck the big one, and the faster will
be the destruction of the GOP so a new party can rise from the ashes to
take over.

The problem with creeping socialism of democrats is that it has time to
lull the sheep to sleep.  What's needed for the proper effect is a full on
full bore sudden tsunami of democratic socialist control of the American
government.  No creep, no sleep, just all Pelosi and Obama clones all the
time 24x7.

Then people like us can support those who come in to pick up the rotting
carcass of the GOP machine.  Third parties don't work because you can't get
ballot access.  So let's starve the GOP to death or near death and then
take over its 50 state ballot access.  In essence we can create a new third
party, it will just be named the GOP and have control of the 50 state GOP
ballot access.

If this doesn't work then a non-violent civil war or a non-violent war of
succession of the states so inclined to succeed from the Union might be the
only way to clean house in Washington and restore some sanity to at least
some parts of what is left of the former USA.

I'm not kidding.

Gary



Mark wrote:
> I agree. Except, I can't bring myself to go so far as to actually cast a
> lever for Hillary but will sit home instead. But you're exactly right, the
> GOP has to be completely destroyed so we can get some competent people in
> there with a new party  rule in the meantime -- I have serious doubts we will, at least not in
> relative calm and freedom from spectacular attacks here on our own land --
> but then, the Reps are about this || far from cutting and running in Iraq
> too, so they're equal opportunity attempted destroyers of this experiment>
>
> "Gary Britt" 
wrote in message
> news:464cd986$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> I called McConnell's office today and told them if they didn't stop this
>> bill I would never vote republican again for the rest of my life, and I
>> definitely mean it.  If they don't stop that bill I will join the moonbat
>> scum I hate calling for impeachment of Bush (just for different reasons).
>> I'll also encourage everyone I know to vote straight democrat until the GOP
>> is crushed and the country is tired of Democrat rule that a new party can
>> rise out of the ashes of the GOP.
>>
>> I'm not kidding.  I've had it.  I won't carry water for these incompetent
>> fools any longer.  I'd rather vote for scum I hate that I know wants to
>> screw me (because they tell everyone they want to screw them you just have
>> to pay attention) than continue to support lying scum incompetents who
>> pretend to be for what I'm for and then screw me.
>>
>> I won't give the GOP another warning.  If I turn out to be representative
>> of a large number of the base in the GOP, then the GOP is about to fuck
>> itself bigger and better than the craziest moonbat ever dreamed possible.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> Mark wrote:
>>> Yup, you got that right Gary. Now that the Reps have rolled over on
>>> amnesty, they may as well vote to surrender in Iraq as well -- then Bush
>>> and Cheney can resign simultaneiously and we'll see what
Pelosi is really
>>> made of. That'll do more for traffic over the Canadian border than the
>>> Vietnam war did 
>>>
>>> "Gary Britt"
 wrote in message
>>> news:464c6b77$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>> Nothing would do the republican party good like a President Pelosi.
>>>>
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>> Ad wrote:
>>>>> Gary Britt wrote:
>>>>>> Quite the opposite.  He didn't want them
disqualified because they
>>>>>> were republican, but don't let common sense and
facts get in the way
>>>>>> of the investigations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Impeach Bush now is what the democrats should do. 
They should put all
>>>>>> their efforts into it.  At this point in time, I'd
rather have
>>>>>> President Cheney than President Bush.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> His father screwed the republican party something
fierce and his son
>>>>>> appears set to out do the old man in this regard. 
A worry I expressed
>>>>>> many times about Bush before 9/11.  A worry I
suppressed after 9/11.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Impeach em both
>>>>>
>>>>> Then who'd it be? Pelosi?
>>>>>
>>>>> Adam
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5