Ross Sauer -> GERRY FORMAN wrote:
 RS> "GERRY FORMAN -> ED HULETT"  wrote in
news:14076
 RS> $POL_DISORDER{at}JamNNTPd:

 ->>> The problem with the GOP this last election was that
 ->>> they made themselves out as a clone of the Democrats.
 ->>> The GOP only wins when they stick with their
 ->>> conservative base.

 GF>> All 21% of the voters?   Priceless.

 RS> Exactly.

Oh, Otto found an new buddy.

 RS> The Karl Rove "fear and smear" M. O. no longer works, and
in fact is
 RS> backfiring on the republicans.

And what makes you think the "Karl Rove M. O." is returning to
the conservative base?

 RS> The "tea parties" were a total failure, all they ended up
doing was showing
 RS> their stupidity.

The tea parties were grass roots organized regardless of your silly claims
and they were not a failure. Between the media and the moonbat blogosphere
they were misrepresented so badly that you moonbats are convinced they
failed.

 RS> Even in a solid republican district in NY state, the republican lost.

Maybe that "solid republican" in office ended up becoming just
another liberal.

 RS> In Minnesota, Norm Coleman is continuing with his sore loser campaign,
 RS> vowing to go all the way to the Supreme Court.

Let him. It's his right to do if he wants. If he would have had a clear
conservative message he might not have ended up where he is now.

 RS> Also in Minnesota, congresswoman Michelle Bachmann is the gift that just
 RS> keeps on giving, with her totally off the wall rantings.

Isn't she a Democrat?

 RS> Meanwhile, Ed is denying the GOP controlled the House, Senate and
 RS> Presidency from 2001 until 2007.

That is a lie. You want a single party rule with the Republicans
"going the way of the whigs." Ironically, the Republican party
grew out of the Whig party. But you think one party rule, as in no choice,
is just fine.

You completely misrepresent what I said. Most likely that is because of
your ignorance WRT politics. We did *NOT* have one party rule in 2001 to
2007. The Republicans didn't have enough of a majority during that time
that the Democrats had no say.

Do you remember the filibusters during the Bush court appointments?

 RS> And they totally botched it all.

They became nothing more than a less liberal Democrat Congress.

Ed

-- 
"Wise politicians will be cautious about fettering the government with
restrictions that cannot be observed, because they know that every
break of the fundamental laws, though dictated by necessity, impairs
that sacred reverence which ought to be maintained in the breast of
rulers towards the constitution of a country."

--Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 25, 21 December 1787

Linux User #416016
Linux Machine #385030

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318)