From: "Geo." 

Wow, no bells are ringing.. I suggested a new type of science would be needed?

Geo.

"John Beckett"  wrote
in message news:3efeac90.7311703{at}216.144.1.254...

> Would you like the long version or the short version? Let's try short:
>
> I was saying that it is quite likely that we will not need any more
> scientific breakthrougs to fully understand all aspects of the human,
> including the mind. Consciousness results from a computer model (in the
> brain) that is sufficiently complete to include itself.
>
> I don't want to put words into your mouth, but I think you were saying
> that it is possible (likely?) that there is some extra feature needed to
> explain how the brain works. The feature was (I think you were saying),
> likely to need a new type of science (new in the way that relativity was
> new, or quantum mechanics was new). ISTR the word
"dimension" being used.
>
> John

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4