From: "Randy H" 

Someone ought to bitch-slap those CICS folks in that old shop for staying
on macro for so long. Sheesh.

"Doug Bryce"  wrote in message
news:3f04d5ed.15221618{at}news.barkto.com...
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 17:33:07 -0500, Bill Lucy 
> wrote:
>
> >Out of darkness, Doug Bryce says...
> >> Why the    ?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, 2 Jul 2003 17:26:41 -0500, Bill Lucy

> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Out of darkness, adam flinton says...
> >> >> I get the willies just thinking about CICS period.
> >> >
> >> >Some of the payroll for the State of Illinois is done under CICS.
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >Although it's quite reliable, changing anything under it has proven to be
a PITA.
> >There are so many "manual" entries, it becomes
unworkable sometimes.
> >
>
>
> The CICS configuration of the payroll system components?    I
> agree....depending on how things are done it can be cumbersome at best
> .   We still used the old assembly language macro tables for most
> of our CICS stuff at my last place - but we were starting to get some
> stuff enabled under RDO as well.
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4