| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | human-readable nodelist format |
Quoting Scott Little on Mon 6 Jan 2003 7:20 to Jan Vermeulen:
sl> Stupid arguement.
sl> Stupid arguement.
sl> Stupid arguement.
sl> Stupid arguement.
sl> Stupid arguement.
I must have had one of these off days. Sorry for that.
sl> You seem to have a problem understanding that XML or any other new
sl> format is not just a rearrangement of the old one. You're
sl> expecting something for nothing, and it's not going to happen. A
sl> new format has "MORE FEATURES, MORE EASY, MORE SHINY!" and it's
sl> going to get bigger as a result. *This is the desired outcome* If
sl> you don't like it, then stay with SLF and all it's limitations.
I may still have my off day, 'coz I did not see any new features, no
more ease and my screen is still as dull as it was before. All I saw was
more room for the same data.
In another posting I have explainend what logistic problems can be
expected from the dual nodelist project you propose.
I would have liked it to be different and thus I will continue to find
ways of improvement, step by step in order not to break the net.
-==-
* Origin: The Poor Man's Workstation -- Wormerveer NL (2:280/100)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 280/100 28/1 10/345 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.