-=> Quoting Richard Meic to Nick Douglas <=-
 RM> 1) Creationism is often claimed to be a science.  When no science is 
 RM> actually done.  (ie. observe, hypothesize, try to disprove through 
 RM> experiment).  Thus, creationism is not a science, a popular idea
 RM> many people like to think is truth, but is in no way substantiated
 RM> by the  scientific method.  NOTE: there is no way to actually prove
 RM> or  disprove creationism (the idea that everything was created by a
 RM> god), and this makes all creationist arguments circular.
Hmmm, I don't know of any Evolutionists who have attempted
to disprove Evolution through experiment.  And, of course,
any evidence to the contrary to Evolution dismissed with
the creation of sub-theories to reconcile contradicting
evidence.  NOTE: Creationists put forth a model that
does make predictions and thus can be tested.
 RM> 2) Creationism stems from a belief in "God".  The key word here is 
 RM> "belief", which makes creationism a religion and has no place being
 RM> argued as a science.
Evolution stems from the belief that there is no God.
 RM> NOTE:  I do hope that you are not like many of the other
 RM> "creationists" that simply regurgitate the same old arguments. :) 
 RM> Originality is THE  key.  ;)
Let me regurgitate:  You're a fascist moron.
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
--- QScan/PCB v1.19b / 01-0066
---------------