TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: guns
to: ALL
from: jpatrick@PONGshentel.net (Jim Patrick)
date: 1999-03-29 00:00:00
subject: Re: NEW Official CA Members` Councils Web page

On Sun, 28 Mar 1999 ,  in talk.politics.guns  Linda Farrier wrote:
>How about law-abiding legislation aimed at the extremists?
>Another thought-kettle=pot.

Are you referring to Chicago Daley-type legislation aimed at 
"people hiding behind the legality of the Constitution" ?  What part
of the Constitution don't you like?  preamble? body? amendments?

There's nothing wrong with disliking the US Constitution, or
disliking parts of it.  That's what the Amendment process is for --
change or improve those parts.  

OTOH you'll get little sympathy from me on "interpreting" or
end-running based on your dislike of the Constitution or a part.
The text of the Constitution; the notes, commentaries and debates by
it's authors; and all the other documents related to it's enactment
make it's intent clear to anyone.   

Constitutionally there's nothing in the NRA position that can be
called "extremist" by any sense of the word.  





     Jim P

"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity."
-Sigmund Freud, General Introduction to Psychoanlysis (1952)

SOURCE: alt.fidonet via archive.org

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.