RS>>> A more elegant solution would be to treat that as just a bit more of
 RS>>> a special case, when no AREA:, assume it must be netmail, so look for
 RS>>> the NETMAIL area in the CONTROL.DAT, instead of just dumping it in
 RS>>> the first one regardless of its name.

 PE>> Got that Paul M?

 PM>  Yeah, now what do you want me to do with it?

Associate it with this:
************************************************************
Ä LOCSYSOP (3:711/934) ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ LOCSYSOP Ä
 Msg  : 2882 of 3032
 From : Paul Markham                        3:711/934.1     Mon 18 Apr 94 18:18

 To   : Anthony May                                         Tue 19 Apr 94 16:25

 Subj : tobruk bug
ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
Ä

 PM>> Wouldn't it be less hassle to run PQWK to convert your packets to QWK?

 AM> Could well be, I just have no intention of joining the ranks of the
 AM> multitude of beta testers (a pensioner, a kiwi, a wog and Rod Speed) for
 AM> it yet, who incidentally seem to continuously be reporting problems...
 AM> ;)

But surely if these guys can manage to do it, it would be really easy for you


It does seem that PQWK is a bit of a dog. If it was written properly it wouldn't
be too bad. Hmmm, I've been looking for another project now I've finished my
packet sorter...
*************************************************************

But not to worry, I want to give Tobruk a bit of a chance to settle down
now, so I think I'll modify PQWK this weekend.

BTW Bill, how's the doco going for PQWK that you said you were going to do?

And Dieter, as the only TinyPoint user who isn't busy trying to stop using
TinyPoint, how about YOU add PQWK200 and zip/unzip to the archive?  BFN.

Paul

--- GoldED/2 2.42.G1114