On (13 Dec 02) mark lewis wrote to Frank Vest...

Hello mark,


 FV> Let me go through this a little better and see what gets
 FV> stirred up.
 ml> you got it!  >

Oh gawd! You're here too??  :)

 FV> Binkp, telnet and ftp are protocols for IP. Just as zedzap,
 FV> emsi, zmodem and others are protocols for POTS.
 ml> i use zedzap, emsi, zmodem, and others on IP with relatively no
 ml> problems...

With telnet?? i wager?

 FV> Of course, the argument is that with POTS, the protocols
 FV> are negotiated upon connection. There is a thread in the
 FV> FTSC_PUBLIC echo that is attempting to work out just such
 FV> a thing for IP Nodes.

 ml> it can be done in IP mailers just exactly like it is done in POTS
 ml> mailers... trouble is, it seems, that coders don't want to or haven't
 ml> figured out how ;-(

Yup. Always go with the new, no matter what, just because. :(


Was my description/proposal/argument accurate and well presented? Did
I make sense? What is your opinion on the idea? You can answer in
Netmail if desired.

Regards,

Frank

http://pages.sbcglobal.net/flv
http://biseonline.com/r19

--- PPoint 3.01