"Anon."  wrote in message
news:bqoo5n$9qc$1{at}darwin.ediacara.org...

> JE:-
> > Typically, you confuse a random
> > pattern with a random process. While
> > the refutation and verification of either
> > a random or non random pattern is possible,
> > it is not possible to verify that only a random
> > process caused any verified random pattern, ever.
> >
> How can you refute a random pattern?  Surely all you can do is refute
> that it was created by a random process, which means that you are
> refuting the hypothesis that it was created by a random process.
>

Am sure John Edser is ready to refute this fundamental aspect of What Is
*really* going on.

[BTW, we would do well (towards understanding the rather encompassing
AEVASIVE aspect of most especially ourselves) to begin dividing this random
process, including the evolutionary pressure totality, into opportunity and
adversity type evolutionary pressures.]

P
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com

---
 * RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
 * RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 12/5/03 8:32:31 PM