On 08/11/2010 03:52 PM, Ross Sauer -> John Massey wrote:
 RS> "John Massey -> BOB KLAHN"  wrote in
 RS> news:9542$ALL-POLITICS{at}JamNNTPd:

 JM>>>> What has any of that got to do with the fact that an
 JM>>>> American judge used sharia law as a reason when allowing a
 JM>>>> rapist and a wife mutilator to go free?

 BK>>> Actually, the judge never mentioned Sharia. Probably doesn't
 BK>>> know any more about it than you do.

 JM>> Bob your absolutely right, the judge, never mention sharia law,
 JM>> however in his opinion it is clear that he was using tenants of sharia
 JM>> law as justification for not singing a restraining order.

 JM>> "This court does not feel that, under the circumstances, that this
 JM>> defendant had a criminal desire to or intent to sexually assault or to
 JM>> sexually contact the plaintiff when he did. The court believes that he
 JM>> was operating under his belief that it is, as the husband, his desire
 JM>> to have sex when and whether he wanted to, was something that was
 JM>> consistent with his practices and it was something that was not
 JM>> prohibited."

 JM>> I think even you would have a hard time making a case for the judge's
 JM>> refusal to sign the restraining order based on American jurisprudence.

 RS> Point 1: The judge in this case was over-ruled.

But the trend is now to look abroad when judging a case. Which includes
considering Sharia law.

 RS> Point 2: I haven't found anything *CLOSE* to this ruling.

Just wait, some other liberal judge will follow suit.

 RS> Point 3: It has nothing to do with my original point, namely that
 RS> professional Muslim-haters like Pam Geller, Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck
 RS> are creating religious bigotry to gain political and financial gain.
 RS> And they whip up their followers into near-homicidal rages.

Show that any of those you mentioned hate Muslims. Show that any of those
you mentioned purposely "whip up [anyone] into near-homicidal
rages." Prove that their rhetoric incites violence.

All you have are the ravings of George Soros' proxies at Medai Matters,
HuffPo and Daily Kos.

You have never listened to any of those you mention beyond highly edited
video and audio clips.

The only hate here is the hate from the left for anyone who they don't
agree with. You can see it in the names they (and you parrot) use to
describe them.

It's laughable how the far left is now supporting the Ground Zero Mosque
simply because many on the right are speaking out against it. The Imam who
is spearheading the effort for the Mosque wants the US to be Sharia
compliant and has denied that Hammas is a terrorist organization. He also
made the claim that the US is complicit in the 9-11 attacks.

The entire thing is political since the area is mostly industrial and
business and very few Muslims live in the area. In fact, if it is built,
Muslims would have to travel 40 minutes from their homes in The Bronx and
Queens to visit the Mosque. Having it there is more of a poke in the eye
for the survivors and families of the victims of 9-11 in particular and the
US in general.

There are already 100+ Mosques in NYC that are closer to where the Muslim
communities are, there is no real need for one 2 blocks from Ground Zero of
9-11.

Ed

-- 
"A nation under a well regulated government, should permit none to
remain uninstructed. It is monarchical and aristocratical government only
that requires ignorance for its support." --Thomas Paine, Rights of
Man, part 2, 1792

Blogs: http://edsramblings.wordpress.com | http://woodcaringnsuch.wordpress.com
http://edsscrollsawbits.blogspot.com | http://eds-omnium-gatherum.blogspot.com

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/ed.hulett | Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/yaesu

Linux User #416016
Linux Machine #385030

--- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunder