EC>~> ->  JB> $20 against the Clinton jail fund that this will be
EC>~> ->  JB> ignored....  You pretty much confirmed my belief.
EC> 
EC>~> -> Because there is nothing to it.
EC>~> -> Zero. Zilch. Nada. Nothing.

EC>~> -> Just the latest Obama smear created by a discredited
EC>~> -> toe-sucker, posted at a discredited far-right web site, linked
EC>~> -> by a discredited gossip writer.
EC> 
EC>~> -> And you fell for it.
EC> 
EC>~> Nicely done!

EC>Sorry to interrupt your back-slapping with facts, but could you
EC>explain exactly WHAT you thought was "well done?"

EC>Was it a "well done" job to call the honest comments of Democrat
EC>Congressman Sestak a "smear" of Obama?  How is that a
"smear?"
EC>Sestak reported what happened.  And now the White House counsel has
EC>released a written summary that agrees that it happened.  The defense
EC>seems to be that it was not illegal since it was an "unpaid" advisory
EC>position.  Whether that is an adequate defense remains to be seen.
EC>But it is wildly mindless to call the agreed-upon facts a "smear."

EC>Or did you think he did a "well done" job of committing three red
EC>herring fallacies in one sentence?  He attacked the messenger by
EC>launching three salvos of shallow name-calling that had nothing to do
EC>with the facts of the matter -- facts once again that have been
EC>agreed to.  Is that what you considered "well done?"


Looks like my $20 against the Clinton jail fund was spot on...  You just 
can't make this stuff up...

=========================================

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/white-house/how-the-sestak-job-
offer-becam.html



Jeff

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999 
Carbon Dioxide makes up just 390 parts per million of atmosphere ....

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10