Hi! Michiel,

On 09 Jun 20 13:12, you wrote to me:

 MV> The "UTF-8 2" instead of "UTF8-8 4" isn't really a problem I think.
 MV> AFAIK all readers/editor that can do UTF-8 seem to ignore the level
 MV> field. I have not heard of a counter example yet.

Yes, I knew this.  Thank you.

 PQ>> That JamNNTPd is in a UTF-8 Linux environment
 MV> That it insists the header is always Latin-1 independant of the
 MV> encoding of the text body is what I consider am more sreious problem.

As I understand it, it's trying to deal with stuff not in the 'text' body.  Is
that close?  :)

Cheers,
Paul.

... Today is merely the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20130515