From: "Gary Britt" 

The great thing about liberals who pretend to be unbiased while complaining
of bias in others, is that they truly are so out of touch that they don't
have a clue as to where they could possibly be biased.  Your statements
below were such a humorous reminder of this.   While it is unlikely to do
any good, I never said your sweeping stereotypes and dramatic
over-simplifications where in the part of your messages dealing with NIH
and noble prizes.  Try to re-read your posts to which my statement below
was appended and see if you can try to find where you have made statements
of sweeping generalizations, stereotypical indictments of entire groups and
classes of people.  I bet you can't find them.  If you do post back what
you found so we can see if you really did find them.

And Dan Rather doesn't think news media is biased to left because he
watches it and it doesn't seemed to be biased to him!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  


Cheers,

Gary


"Judy Folkenberg"  wrote in
message news:3F8FFD9E.C06B6CAF{at}mail.nlm.nih.gov...
>
>
> Gary Britt wrote:
>
> > >>Your sweeping false stereotypes and dramatic
over-simplifications make
it
> > hard for me to take seriously complaints about such things in others.
> >
>
> Huh?  I don't understand.  The former director of the National Cancer
Institute
> is now medical director of Bill Gates's foundation.  NIH does have several
nobel
> laureates that worked for the varous Institutes.   Scientists there did do
major
> work in unraveling the secrets of AIDS.  Scientists there have discovered
some
> of the major genetic underpinnings of diseases.  Those are not
generalizations.
>
> Judy
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5