-> DN> he left the team, and were starting to put up more points to go
-> DN> that always stellar defense.
->
->points. As hard as this might be to believe about a team scoring
->400 or more points, they just didn't have what it took to be a
->good offensive team.
And it sure showed up in their record. Yeah, they weren't a very good
offensive team at all. 400 points is pretty brutal. 25+ points a game sits
just fine with me.
You're just analyzing the stats until they turn, however slightly, in your
favour.
->I'm look at their careers NOT today vs today (You're the one who
->automatically assumed that I was talking in those terms).
This is what I read:
"He's already better than O'Donnel ever was"
If you don't want me misreading your statements, make them clearer. I agree
that Kordell has more potential than O'Donnel, and that he will probably be
a better QB than O'Donnell soon.
(Btw, that quote's from memory, I'll go check exactly what you said, and if
it's significantly different, I may follow this up.. so don't jump all over
me right away for misquoting :)
-*- TurboEDIT v1.60a+ [MSP96]
--- Ezycom V1.48g0 01fa0167
---------------
* Origin: Milky Way, Langley, BC [604] 532-4367 (1:153/307)
|