Hi Graeme
28 Feb 98, Graeme Jaye writes to Gerry Clark:
> take the kit with you . The original question was posed by
> someone who wanted a universally portable format so that
> *anyone* could play his audio recordings - obviously, MD could not
> be said to fit into that bracket.
>
GC>> The compression isn't obtrusive or obvious, even when playing
GC>> at volume through a large PA.
>
> That's a matter of opinion. You (and your audience) may find it
> acceptable for the application but I can only say that I looked at
> MD several years ago with a view to using it as an audio source via
> an infra-red link.
I can hear the difference and thats what counts.Sure you can play
with the EQ and make it reasonable for some sounds,but unless you
have your own soundman.........
Another reason that I didn't go the MD route for performances was that
I found they had a tendency to skip with relativley little vibration.
A Bose 5000 watt PA at medium to high levels was more than capable
of causing it to skip at the remotes maximum range,wherever I sited
the MD.
This was in the real early days of MD and things may have improved
since then....I know the prices certainly have :-)
Regards,
Rick
--- GoldED/2 2.42.G0614
---------------
* Origin: Pointless Network (3:770/105)
|