Hello Michiel!

** On Monday 08.06.20 - 11:15, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to August Abolins:

 AA>>    But that is not what FTS-0009 says at all.

 MvdV> Indeed. It says "valid returm address in the originating network"
 MvdV> "5667.fidotest@4:801/194" is not a vaild ADDRESS!

 AA>> It just says that info on that line can be constructed so that it can
 AA>> be  returned in a valid way.

 MvdV> It sats nothing about "construed". All it says is "valid return
 MvdV> address".

I think your eyes are crossed or something.  I never wrote "construed".  I  
think this might explain some of what you are not understanding.


 AA>> I have no doubt that a message to user 5667.fidotest at 4:801/194 will
 AA>> get  validly returned.  All the "parts" are there.

 MvdV> 1) "5667.fidotest at 4:801/194" != "5667.fidotest@4:801/194"

Sure, in a purely literal text-based sense.

Why don't you give us YOUR example of what FTS-0009's "^AMSGID: origaddr  
serialno" should look like for the message we were discussing?


 MvdV> 2) 5667.fidotest is not the name of the user that wrote the message. So
 MvdV> it will never reach the user that wrote te message.

Good grief. :(  The FTS-0009 never says that the particular message has be  
returned to the user.  It just has to be returnable based on the info in  
the msgid.

I'm outta here.

  ../|ug

--- OpenXP 5.0.44