From: "Adam Flinton" 


"George Sherwood"  wrote in message
news:pan.2003.03.05.01.25.06.503914{at}beernabeer.com...
> On Wed, 05 Mar 2003 01:07:32 +0000, Adam Flinton wrote:
>
> >> > Of a constellation in the 60'es????
> >>
> >> Yes
> >
> > That's some time ago.
>
> But it was the last NK intercept.  Not a good precedent from the RC-135's
> point of view.
>
>

Heck you were losing all sorts of aircraft over vietnam at that
time.....does that mean that sending an aircraft carrier into the south
china sea means the same thing now as it did then (say to the people in
Hanoi)?

> > Brushing the borders.....in & out...
>
> You are just making a statement with no proof.  It doesn't have anything
> to do with this case.  We don't cross NK borders.  You don't violate
> territorial airspace.  Your repeated saying we are doing this won't make
it so.
> >

OK. I'm sure you wouldn't do that in a P3.

Why, when you could send an unmanned drone.

But re "it doesn't make it so"...how would one get these sorts of photos :

http://www.fas.org/irp/imint/vn_crb2.htm

http://www.fas.org/irp/imint/vn_crb1.htm

if  "You don't violate territorial airspace" was an absolute rule?

ooohhh that was 1987...things have changed since then....OK then we did but
now...& there are no new photos of Iraq between the no fly zones taken
from aircraft right?

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4