| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: House of Windsor |
From: Gene McAloon Well, in England at least, there are not all that many royals around. Almost of necessity you take commoners to bed with you, even servants if that seems more convenient. Otherwise, you end up screwing your own cousins. There is already too much inbreeding among the royal houses of Europe to risk any more of that. As it is, they got Charles out of it and that was no bargain. If what they say about Harry is true, they mightn't have got much of a bargain there either. On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 17:12:13 -0500, Judy Folkenberg wrote: > > >Gene McAloon wrote: > >> >> >>It is rather like the American Old South. The black slaves had to be kept in >> their place of course, but that didn't necessarily mean kept out of the master's >> bed. It is hugely amusing, all of it. > >You're absolutely right. I hadn't thought of it that way. > >What's ironic with these class distinctions (and I'd include past American slaves) is >that while the lower or servant class in Britian or the slaves in America couldn't >share tea in the parlor with the ruling class, they could share a bed--and engage in >a very intimate act. > >Judy > --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.