"Ed Hulett -> Earl Croasmun"  wrote in
news:14854$POL_DISORDER{at}JamNNTPd:

 ~>>> In fact the only SC ruling I can think of that *WAS* fascist in
 EC>> nature was
 ~>>> the Dred Scott ruling, which pretty much stated, "The US is
 EH>   whites only, ~>> n****** don't count."

 EC>> What in the world does that have to do with fascism?

 EH> He doesn't know. In a post to Tim, he claims fascism is based on
 EH> racism.

I didn't say that, you fucking liar.
I said racism, most notably vicious racism, is part of fascism.
Now if you still can't get it right, just admit you're a total moron.

 ~>>> This ruling lets unions and even Hugo Chavez dump as much money
 EH>   as they ~>> want to to any candidate they want to.

 EC>> Federal law prohibits foreign contributions.  If you had been
 EH>   awake during EC> the Clinton campaign finance scandal, you would
 EH>   have known that.

 EH> Don't expect Ar-Kay to acknowledge that. It would be interesting to
 EH> find out where he got the idea the SC made it okay for Chavez to
 EH> contribute to US campaigns. You know he doesn't come up with this
 EH> lunacy on his own. He isn't smart enough.

So Pat Buchanan was lying when he said that now Cahvez can dump money into
campaigns through the companies he controls, with US subsidiaries?

--- Xnews/5.04.25