Hello Michiel!
** On Sunday 07.06.20 - 19:43, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to August Abolins:
AA>> 4:801/194 exists in my nodelist.
MvdV> It also exists in mine. But "5667.fidotest@4:801/194" does not. If you
MvdV> want to argue that it adresses a partular user:
MvdV> 1) user.name@zone:net/node.point is NOT an accepted way of getting mail
MvdV> to a paricular user. The accepted way is to put the user name in the
MvdV> To: field of a message and the zone:net/ node.point in the adress
MvdV> field.
OpenXP has no problem with that. ;)
If I want to quote/reply, Ctrl-P generates this:
旼 Private message (quote) 컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴커
� �
� To Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 �
� �
� Subject Test From Blue Wave Door �
� �
읕컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴�
It would have no problem with:
旼 Private message (quote) 컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴커
� �
� To 5667.fidotest@4:801/194 �
� �
� Subject Test From Blue Wave Door �
� �
읕컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴�
I do not have two fields to worry about. "To" above has some smarts built
into it and simplified for me.
This will VERY MUCH get to sent to 4:801/194, no problem.
MvdV> 2) "5667.fidotest" is not a user name. It obviously is some kind of
MvdV> mesaage number in the area : fidotest".
The user name is irrelevant. There is no public list of all users on a BBS
akin to no public list of all users at @vandervlist.com
All that matters is that the message to 5667.fidotest gets delivered to
4:801/194. What happens to it is up to the sysop.
MvdV> Whatever way you twist it, "5667.fidotest@4:801/194" is NOT the address
MvdV> of a system in Fidonet.
Correct. 4:801.194 is the "address", and 5667.fidotest is the "name".
No problem. ;)
../|ug
--- OpenXP 5.0.44
* Origin: This is a test of the Emergency Tagline System (2:221/1.58)
|